Immigrants from Sweden vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,434,826 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.912. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.901% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 900.6 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $37,842, a difference of 46.9%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $91,763, a difference of 33.8%), and median household income ($100,699 compared to $75,814, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $50,852, a difference of 5.4%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($54,478 compared to $42,615, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 31.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 29.6%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 64.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 125.4%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 107.5%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 88.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 82.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.4%).