Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,767,711 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.904. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.656% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 1,656.3 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 73.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,318 compared to $85,552, a difference of 38.3%), and median family income ($122,765 compared to $89,249, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $54,538, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $41,932, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($54,478 compared to $45,596, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 91.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 66.6%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 50.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 46.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 41.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 52.1%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 27.2%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.23%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 245.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 125.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 110.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 42.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 92.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 110.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 109.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 79.1%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.6%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.87%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.5%).