Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,578,340 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.050% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 1,049.8 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $38,165, a difference of 45.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $80,863, a difference of 38.5%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $47,981, a difference of 11.7%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $37,970, a difference of 17.9%), and median earnings ($54,478 compared to $42,923, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 62.8%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.15%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 43.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 62.5%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.77%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.1%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 95.2%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 92.4%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 33.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.7%).