Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,473,527 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.431% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 430.8 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $43,464, a difference of 27.9%), median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $53,237, a difference of 22.9%), and median family income ($122,765 compared to $101,354, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $52,643, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $39,186, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 31.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.5%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (47.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.7%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 52.8%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.7%).