Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,952,200 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.449% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 449.2 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $49,893, a difference of 11.4%), median earnings ($54,478 compared to $50,741, a difference of 7.4%), and median family income ($122,765 compared to $114,392, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $52,638, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $66,620, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.8%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.10%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 6.5%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (62.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.40%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.0%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.040%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.3%).