Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,923,657 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $66,620, a difference of 19.1%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $49,893, a difference of 17.6%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $114,392, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $52,638, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $41,771, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($47,304 compared to $50,741, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 58.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.50%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 63.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.8%).