Immigrants from Portugal vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,358,071 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $79,171, a difference of 25.3%), median household income ($84,740 compared to $68,412, a difference of 23.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $77,260, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $50,475, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $34,106, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 48.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 30.9%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.45%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.52%), female unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.3%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.060%), currently married (45.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.80%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.3%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 36.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.8%).