Immigrants from Portugal vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,818,778 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.289% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to an increase of 289.2 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $44,010, a difference of 25.4%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $34,195, a difference of 24.0%), and median earnings ($47,304 compared to $38,907, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $55,573, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $53,077, a difference of 5.4%), and median household income ($84,740 compared to $76,670, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 42.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.50%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 60.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.18 compared to 3.58, a difference of 12.6%), family households (65.2% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 75.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 57.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.4%).