Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,128,218 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 26.8 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 24.6%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $60,096, a difference of 7.5%), and per capita income ($42,412 compared to $44,509, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,740 compared to $85,025, a difference of 0.34%), median earnings ($47,304 compared to $47,657, a difference of 0.75%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $102,823, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 26.1%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.50%), single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.2%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and family households (65.2% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.25%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.31%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and 3rd grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.4%).