Immigrants from Portugal vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,023,008 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.074% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to an increase of 73.7 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $59,934, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $97,958, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,740 compared to $84,011, a difference of 0.87%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $98,340, a difference of 0.88%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $39,376, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.88%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 18.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.38%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 41.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.92%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 84.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.9%).