Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,800,985 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 11.4 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 65.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $85,552, a difference of 16.0%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $89,249, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $54,538, a difference of 0.80%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $41,123, a difference of 3.1%), and median earnings ($47,304 compared to $45,596, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 47.0%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.1%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.51%), single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 57.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 56.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.7%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and currently married (45.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and family households (65.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 219.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 123.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 105.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 40.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 84.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 105.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and bachelor's degree (32.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 90.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.61%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%).