Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Egypt Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,688,756 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Egypt. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 13.0 Immigrants from Egypt.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $64,299, a difference of 15.0%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $47,361, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $109,941, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $54,239, a difference of 0.25%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and median earnings ($47,304 compared to $50,901, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 38.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.4%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.60%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 43.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 10.7%).