Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,446,541 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 43.3%), householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $50,747, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,284 compared to $85,552, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,564 compared to $45,596, a difference of 2.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $88,311, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $41,932, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 39.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 38.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 43.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.1%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 49.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.42%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 199.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 104.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 93.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 39.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 80.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 93.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 43.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.9%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.38%), 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 29.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.19%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.3%).