Immigrants from Haiti vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,674,352 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Haiti communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Haiti within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Haiti corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.8%), median female earnings ($36,203 compared to $41,932, a difference of 15.8%), and median earnings ($40,550 compared to $45,596, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,219 compared to $50,747, a difference of 0.93%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,257 compared to $85,552, a difference of 2.8%), and median household income ($72,599 compared to $76,517, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 13.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.8%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.39 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.5%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (65.3% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 143.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 35.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 62.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.5%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and 10th grade (91.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 32.5%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.6%).