Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,835,549 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 32.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $50,747, a difference of 18.4%), and median family income ($102,823 compared to $89,249, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $41,932, a difference of 1.1%), median earnings ($47,657 compared to $45,596, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $54,538, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 51.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 40.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 49.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 49.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 52.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.1%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (60.8% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 253.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 113.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 96.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 42.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 83.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 96.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 54.3%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.57%), male disability (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).