Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,229,481 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 67.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,277 compared to $50,747, a difference of 26.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,267 compared to $85,552, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,820 compared to $41,932, a difference of 0.27%), householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $54,538, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($50,227 compared to $45,596, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 71.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 51.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 46.8%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 42.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.0%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.27%), family households (63.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 237.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 113.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 103.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 42.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 89.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 103.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.9%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 45.9%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 45.1%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).