Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,048,669 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 24.4 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 76.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $50,747, a difference of 28.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,402 compared to $85,552, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $41,932, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $54,538, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($50,192 compared to $45,596, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 83.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 64.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 54.0%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 50.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 53.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.0%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 329.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 138.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 122.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 45.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 100.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 122.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 68.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.5%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.1%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 52.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%).