Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,742,003 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 29.5 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 43.9%), householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $50,747, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,537 compared to $85,552, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,090 compared to $45,596, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($40,434 compared to $41,123, a difference of 1.7%), and median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $50,279, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 31.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 46.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 44.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.4%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 19.7%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.29%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 267.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 169.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 131.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 43.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 96.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 131.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.1% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and 11th grade (89.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.3%).