Immigrants from Spain vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,284,985 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Spain communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Spain within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Spain corresponds to a decrease of 48.6 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 65.5%), median family income ($113,815 compared to $89,249, a difference of 27.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,051 compared to $85,552, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,560 compared to $54,538, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($42,815 compared to $41,932, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($51,092 compared to $45,596, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 59.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 45.5%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.90%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.0%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.36%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 157.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 97.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 86.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 36.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 75.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 86.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 87.0%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 69.2%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 25.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.51%), male disability (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.9%).