Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,857,395 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 85.6 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 74.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,893 compared to $85,552, a difference of 43.6%), and median family income ($127,430 compared to $89,249, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $54,538, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($46,902 compared to $41,932, a difference of 11.8%), and median earnings ($57,034 compared to $45,596, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 77.6%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 50.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 62.1%), births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 44.4%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 140.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 74.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 34.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 71.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 71.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 122.4%), professional degree (7.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 109.9%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%).