Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,200,459 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Ethiopia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ethiopia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ethiopia corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 33.4%), householder income over 65 years ($65,238 compared to $50,747, a difference of 28.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,763 compared to $85,552, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,744 compared to $41,932, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,408 compared to $54,538, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($48,924 compared to $45,596, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 66.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 53.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.7%), single female poverty (20.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 51.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (69.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (61.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 259.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 109.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 42.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 85.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 96.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 71.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.8%), and master's degree (17.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.32%), 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and 4th grade (97.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.5%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.5%).