Immigrants from Kuwait vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,681,041 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Kuwait communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.767. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kuwait within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.210% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kuwait corresponds to an increase of 210.2 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 64.4%), householder income over 65 years ($64,433 compared to $50,747, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,285 compared to $85,552, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,055 compared to $41,932, a difference of 2.1%), median earnings ($48,861 compared to $45,596, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,122 compared to $88,311, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 77.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 55.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.58%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 52.9%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 45.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 40.9%), births to unmarried women (28.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.42%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 300.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 125.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 110.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 44.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 94.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 110.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 86.5%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 53.5%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 29.8%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.46%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and male disability (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.2%).