Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,575,110 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 57.3%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $50,747, a difference of 40.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $85,552, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,017 compared to $41,123, a difference of 0.26%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $54,538, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $45,596, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 77.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 68.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.1%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 40.4%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 33.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 47.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.2%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 387.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 243.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 174.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 47.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 114.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 174.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 74.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 68.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 42.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.70%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.83%).