Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,846,572 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 28.8 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.5%), householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $50,747, a difference of 27.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $85,552, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $41,932, a difference of 0.66%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $41,123, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $54,538, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 46.6%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 46.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 14.0%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 50.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 33.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.7%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (68.8% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 379.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 251.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 186.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 47.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 117.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 186.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and 12th grade, no diploma (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.82%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%).