Immigrants from Austria vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,739,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Austria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Austria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Austria corresponds to an increase of 213.4 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 73.9%), householder income over 65 years ($68,208 compared to $50,747, a difference of 34.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,140 compared to $85,552, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,824 compared to $41,932, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,400 compared to $54,538, a difference of 4.1%), and median earnings ($51,826 compared to $45,596, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 87.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 62.5%), and family poverty (7.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.73%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 47.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 49.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 55.9%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.60%), family households (63.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 267.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 120.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 107.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 43.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 93.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 107.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 78.0%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 64.3%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 42.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), disability (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.2%).