Blackfeet vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,548,371 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.847. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.775% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 774.6 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $34,886, a difference of 8.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $82,184, a difference of 5.4%), and median family income ($88,717 compared to $84,451, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $54,668, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $80,260, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $49,395, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.2%), single male poverty (15.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 39.2%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 10.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and single female poverty (25.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 57.5%), male unemployment (6.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 43.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Apache communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.24 compared to 3.46, a difference of 6.8%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.32%), currently married (44.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Apache communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (40.3% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 11.3%), bachelor's degree (31.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.5%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.91%), disability (13.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.8%).