Blackfeet vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,298,660 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.613. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 8.2 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $32,345, a difference of 16.5%), median male earnings ($48,402 compared to $41,758, a difference of 15.9%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $36,586, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 7.5%), median family income ($88,717 compared to $82,064, a difference of 8.1%), and median household income ($73,509 compared to $67,965, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 41.5%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 0.73%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 119.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 104.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 95.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 24.2%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.64, a difference of 12.0%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.5%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 33.4%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.9%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.38%), 11th grade (92.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.39%), male disability (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.61%).