Blackfeet vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,730,510 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to a decrease of 11.8 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $102,123, a difference of 17.9%), per capita income ($37,695 compared to $44,440, a difference of 17.9%), and median family income ($88,717 compared to $104,288, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $50,554, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $38,397, a difference of 7.1%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $46,463, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 44.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.5%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (15.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%), and male unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.0%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 43.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.10%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.3%).