Native Hawaiian vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,019,307 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $61,735, a difference of 15.0%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $50,554, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,397, a difference of 0.17%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $94,622, a difference of 0.46%), and median family income ($104,910 compared to $104,288, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.18%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.43 compared to 3.11, a difference of 10.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.1%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.4%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.51%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.3%).