Bahamian vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,999,389 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.086% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to a decrease of 86.5 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 43.9%), median family income ($82,631 compared to $104,288, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,369 compared to $102,123, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $38,397, a difference of 9.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $50,554, a difference of 10.5%), and median earnings ($39,735 compared to $46,463, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 72.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 55.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (22.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.4%), births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and married-couple households (40.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.7%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 33.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.1%).