Norwegian vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,476,945 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 18.4 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $50,554, a difference of 5.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $94,622, a difference of 2.4%), and median family income ($106,144 compared to $104,288, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,480 compared to $44,440, a difference of 0.090%), median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $55,793, a difference of 0.31%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.61%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.1%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.08 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.77%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.35%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.7%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.7%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 1.8%).