Houma vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,711,720 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 68.6 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $102,123, a difference of 41.6%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $61,735, a difference of 37.7%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $104,288, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $55,793, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $50,554, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $46,463, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 84.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 71.9%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 25.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 39.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 75.4%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.0%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 46.7%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 69.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 51.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 40.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 106.9%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 105.6%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 97.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 51.1%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.9%).