Crow vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,125,947 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 14.4 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 52.8%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $44,440, a difference of 40.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $102,123, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $50,554, a difference of 7.5%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,397, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $46,463, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 124.0%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 102.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 28.2%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 35.9%), and single female poverty (32.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 48.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 251.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 242.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 235.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.1%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.4%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 63.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.68%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 44.3%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 42.7%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.49%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.5%).