Immigrants from Brazil vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 341,274,532 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 67.7 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $44,440, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $50,554, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $61,735, a difference of 1.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,470 compared to $102,123, a difference of 4.3%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $55,793, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 23.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.54%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.0%), married-couple households (46.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 59.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.9% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.5%).