Immigrants from Europe vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,396,286 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $52,638, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($43,523 compared to $41,771, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,984 compared to $112,175, a difference of 0.17%), median family income ($115,523 compared to $114,392, a difference of 0.99%), and median household income ($95,032 compared to $94,091, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.6%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 6.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.7%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (63.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.40%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.6%).