Brazilian vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,939,999 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $66,620, a difference of 8.4%), median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $61,220, a difference of 7.7%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $41,771, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $52,638, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($48,356 compared to $50,741, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 22.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.1%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.030%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and family households (63.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.6%), college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%).