Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Scotland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Immigrants from Scotland

Poor
Excellent
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,569,293 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Immigrants from Scotland.
Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities

Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $49,893, a difference of 51.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $105,089, a difference of 37.9%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $114,392, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $52,638, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $66,620, a difference of 18.5%), and wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 20.9%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Income
Income MetricYakamaImmigrants from Scotland
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Exceptional
$114,392
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Exceptional
$94,091
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Exceptional
$50,741
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Exceptional
$61,220
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Exceptional
$41,771
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Good
$52,638
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Exceptional
$105,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Exceptional
$112,175
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Exceptional
$66,620
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Tragic
28.7%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 138.1%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 115.8%), and family poverty (13.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 78.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.5%), single male poverty (15.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 25.8%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 31.9%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaImmigrants from Scotland
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
13.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
27.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
9.0%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 99.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 91.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.7%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaImmigrants from Scotland
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.2%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaImmigrants from Scotland
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Exceptional
38.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Good
83.0%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 101.5%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 53.3%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%), family households (69.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 8.9%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaImmigrants from Scotland
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Excellent
30.4%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 94.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 49.0%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.0%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Scotland
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
58.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Excellent
6.7%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 118.0%), master's degree (9.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 83.7%), and bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaImmigrants from Scotland
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
69.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Exceptional
63.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
42.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.7%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Scotland Disability
Disability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Scotland
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Good
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%