Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,226,170 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.143% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 142.9 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,943 compared to $94,091, a difference of 6.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $112,175, a difference of 6.2%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,555 compared to $49,893, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($63,099 compared to $61,220, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $52,638, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 11.9%), divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.68%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.9%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.3%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.0%).