Immigrants from Vietnam vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,995,568 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Vietnam communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Vietnam within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Vietnam corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,229 compared to $49,893, a difference of 15.4%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and median male earnings ($54,913 compared to $61,220, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($91,987 compared to $94,091, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($40,153 compared to $41,771, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,535 compared to $105,089, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.6%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.36%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.8% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.90%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 104.5%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Vietnam and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.37%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.8%).