Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,582,526 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $52,638, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and median household income ($99,933 compared to $94,091, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,741 compared to $49,893, a difference of 0.31%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $66,620, a difference of 1.5%), and median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $61,220, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.5%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.43%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 48.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.2% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.6%).