Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,935,066 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,495 compared to $49,893, a difference of 20.2%), median family income ($97,958 compared to $114,392, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,340 compared to $112,175, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $52,638, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $41,771, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($46,333 compared to $50,741, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.83%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 23.3%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 80.3%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 70.6%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 10.4%).