Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,470,534 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.925. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 125.9 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $112,175, a difference of 41.7%), median family income ($81,852 compared to $114,392, a difference of 39.8%), and per capita income ($35,922 compared to $49,893, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $52,638, a difference of 14.9%), and median female earnings ($34,106 compared to $41,771, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 59.2%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 59.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.0%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.57%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.12, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 69.6%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 63.6%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 45.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.5%).