Japanese vs Cambodian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Japanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cambodian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Japanese

Cambodians

Fair
Exceptional
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cambodian Integration in Japanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,261,287 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 85.6 Cambodians.
Japanese Integration in Cambodian Communities

Japanese vs Cambodian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $51,731, a difference of 29.7%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $62,516, a difference of 21.4%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $117,780, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $55,571, a difference of 6.1%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $66,892, a difference of 15.5%).
Japanese vs Cambodian Income
Income MetricJapaneseCambodian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,870
Exceptional
$51,731
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,288
Exceptional
$117,780
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,395
Exceptional
$96,324
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,825
Exceptional
$53,386
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,473
Exceptional
$62,516
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,528
Exceptional
$45,014
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,365
Exceptional
$55,571
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,624
Exceptional
$107,148
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,834
Exceptional
$114,342
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,919
Exceptional
$66,892
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Average
25.8%

Japanese vs Cambodian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 47.7%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.1%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.7%).
Japanese vs Cambodian Poverty
Poverty MetricJapaneseCambodian
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Japanese vs Cambodian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Japanese vs Cambodian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJapaneseCambodian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%

Japanese vs Cambodian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Japanese vs Cambodian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJapaneseCambodian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Good
37.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
84.1%

Japanese vs Cambodian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.7%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (44.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.15, a difference of 6.2%).
Japanese vs Cambodian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJapaneseCambodian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.5%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.2%
Exceptional
26.7%

Japanese vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.6%).
Japanese vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJapaneseCambodian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.5%

Japanese vs Cambodian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 76.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Japanese vs Cambodian Education Level
Education Level MetricJapaneseCambodian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.7%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
47.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Japanese vs Cambodian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.9%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.2%).
Japanese vs Cambodian Disability
Disability MetricJapaneseCambodian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%