Brazilian vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,972,132 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 70.4 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $45,014, a difference of 11.2%), per capita income ($46,700 compared to $51,731, a difference of 10.8%), and median earnings ($48,356 compared to $53,386, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $55,571, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $96,324, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.23%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.1%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.69%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.95%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.6%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.78%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.5%).