Celtic vs Cambodian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cambodian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Cambodians

Average
Exceptional
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cambodian Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,554,649 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 114.8 Cambodians.
Celtic Integration in Cambodian Communities

Celtic vs Cambodian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $51,731, a difference of 18.6%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $45,014, a difference of 17.6%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $53,386, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $55,571, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $66,892, a difference of 10.4%).
Celtic vs Cambodian Income
Income MetricCelticCambodian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Exceptional
$51,731
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Exceptional
$117,780
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Exceptional
$96,324
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Exceptional
$53,386
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Exceptional
$62,516
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Exceptional
$45,014
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Exceptional
$55,571
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Exceptional
$107,148
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Exceptional
$114,342
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Exceptional
$66,892
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Average
25.8%

Celtic vs Cambodian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Celtic vs Cambodian Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticCambodian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Celtic vs Cambodian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
Celtic vs Cambodian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticCambodian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%

Celtic vs Cambodian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Celtic vs Cambodian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticCambodian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Good
37.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
84.1%

Celtic vs Cambodian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 24.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.33%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Celtic vs Cambodian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticCambodian
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
26.7%

Celtic vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 35.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.0%).
Celtic vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticCambodian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
5.5%

Celtic vs Cambodian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.9%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.13%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Celtic vs Cambodian Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticCambodian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
47.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.6%

Celtic vs Cambodian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.4%).
Celtic vs Cambodian Disability
Disability MetricCelticCambodian
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%