Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,224,403 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 25.2 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 33.7%), median family income ($93,988 compared to $117,780, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $114,342, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $55,571, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $45,014, a difference of 10.1%), and median earnings ($45,729 compared to $53,386, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 65.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.5%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and single female poverty (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 36.0%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.71%), family households (64.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 126.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 16.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 33.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 53.5%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.3%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.3%).