Slavic vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,630,956 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.667. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.629% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 2,629.2 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $51,731, a difference of 14.8%), median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $45,014, a difference of 13.6%), and median earnings ($47,470 compared to $53,386, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $66,892, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $55,571, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 18.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.80%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 21.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.23%), high school diploma (91.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.9%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.5%).