Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cambodian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Cambodians

Fair
Exceptional
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cambodian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,248,176 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 60.0 Cambodians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Cambodian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $51,731, a difference of 32.1%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $96,324, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $114,342, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.32%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $66,892, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $55,571, a difference of 7.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanCambodian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Exceptional
$51,731
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Exceptional
$117,780
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$96,324
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$53,386
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$62,516
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Exceptional
$45,014
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$55,571
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$107,148
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$114,342
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Exceptional
$66,892
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Average
25.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 63.4%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 53.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanCambodian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 96.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 96.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanCambodian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanCambodian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Good
37.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
84.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 71.3%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.71%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanCambodian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
26.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 47.1%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 43.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCambodian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
5.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 72.8%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 63.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanCambodian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
47.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 88.0%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 17.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cambodian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCambodian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%