Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,294,256 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $66,892, a difference of 8.1%), per capita income ($48,027 compared to $51,731, a difference of 7.7%), and median family income ($110,614 compared to $117,780, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,484 compared to $55,571, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $107,148, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 16.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.73%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.3%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.6%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.6%).