Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,747,131 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.823. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.011% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 1,010.5 Tlingit-Haida.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $43,516, a difference of 19.0%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $52,409, a difference of 18.7%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $45,468, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $55,914, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $62,922, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $39,513, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.8%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 145.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.5%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and family households (63.4% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.4%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.9%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 44.5%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 55.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.9%).